{"id":387,"date":"2011-12-13T06:03:41","date_gmt":"2011-12-13T14:03:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.orangefroglogistics.com\/?p=387"},"modified":"2014-02-01T00:36:35","modified_gmt":"2014-02-01T08:36:35","slug":"44-what-training-wheels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/orangefroglogistics.com\/blog\/item\/44-what-training-wheels","title":{"rendered":"What training wheels?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Process, inbound goods, onsite receipt, warranty and repair, contract plan to sourcing, contract development, stock reorder, material master\u2026 and the rest. There is no\u00a0red bow<\/a>\u00a0on it, yet the package is scheduled to be launched next March, and, in spite of the mix of interest and concern from my client\u2019s procurement group, it does not quite feel like a much anticipated holiday gift. The introduction of a renowned enterprise resource planning software is often like a controversial reality TV show: we know of it, we do not quite understand the whole message behind, and we rarely remain indifferent about it, with a conclusive \u201clike\u201d or \u201cunlike\u201d idea.<\/p>\n Although we know the current system qualifies for an antique store, the users got used to it, and, even if some are still ranting about it, they have become so accustomed to it that it seems unrealistic (and sometimes melodramatic) to consider a different way to function. Introducing a new vision may sound revolutionary when the message is poorly received. All comes down to the sales pitch, and showing some awareness about the audience, especially when the audience will soon turn into end users. Tough exercise, whether we speak the same language: presenting a brand new tool which may (and likely will) lead to a deeper revision of internal processes takes a certain talent, sometimes\u00a0artistic<\/a>, so the pill gets swallowed as smoothly as possible.<\/p>\n